FoldersFeatured 0
Misc News 414
Results 483
Recaps 31
Previews 8
News 27
Webcast Info 45
Awards 7
Entries 119
Rankings 29
RRW 4
ACC 0
Big Ten 0
Big 12 0
Big Sky 0
Big West 0
C-USA 0
Colonial 0
Horizon 0
Ivy 0
gocrimson XC 30
MAAC 0
MAC 0
MEAC 0
themwc.com XC 177
NEC 0
Pac-12 0
Patriot 0
SEC 0
secsports.com XC 119
SoCon 0
Sun Belt 0
SWAC 0
WAC 0
|
DI Outdoor Track and Field Team Rankings Update — Week 2, April 10Published by
DI Outdoor Track & Field Team Rankings Update — Week 2, April 10Courtesy: Tom Lewis, USTFCCCA April 10, 2012 NEW ORLEANS – According to the latest USTFCCCA National Team Computer Rankings for Division I Outdoor Track & Field, Florida’s men and Oregon’s women remain the top teams in the country. On the men’s side, Florida State notched back to No. 2, a position they held in the preseason rankings. Three-time defending champs Texas A&M moved into the top five for the first time in the outdoor season at No. 4. On the women’s side, the top three teams stay the same with No. 1 Oregon, No. 2 LSU, and No. 3 Clemson holding serve. Florida jumped four spots up to No. 7, reaching the top ten for the first time so far this season. National Ranking PDFs: Top 25 | Full by Team | Event-by-Event | Week-by-Week
ABOUT THE RANKINGSFor more on the rankings and links to guideline and rationale information visit … The purpose and methodology of the national team computer rankings is to create an index that showcases the teams that have the best potential of achieving the top spots in the national-title race – not as a method to compare teams head-to-head. The Regional Index is determined using a similar method as national rankings, but on a smaller scale, comparing teams versus others within the same region. The result is a ranking that showcases squads with better all-around team potential — a group makeup critical for conference or similar team-scored events. A team may achieve a better regional ranking than a counterpart that has a better national ranking. Historically, some teams are better national-championship teams than conference-championship teams, having a few elite athletes that score very well in a diverse environment where teams do not have entries in more than a few events. Some teams are better at conference championships or similar team-scored events where they enter, and are competitive, in many of the events. How a team fares in a national championship, conference championship, or scored meet with only a couple or few teams (like a dual or triangular) can be very different, given the number of events, competition, scoring, and makeup of entries — thus the rationale behind each of the ranking systems. Similar arguments about team makeup and rankings can also be found in swimming & diving and wrestling as their sports also have a similar trichotomy when it comes to team theory. More news
0 comment(s)
History for DyeStatCOLLEGE.com
Show 28 more
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Folders |
DI Outdoor Track and Field Team Rankings Update — Week 2, April 10Published by
DI Outdoor Track & Field Team Rankings Update — Week 2, April 10Courtesy: Tom Lewis, USTFCCCA April 10, 2012 NEW ORLEANS – According to the latest USTFCCCA National Team Computer Rankings for Division I Outdoor Track & Field, Florida’s men and Oregon’s women remain the top teams in the country. On the men’s side, Florida State notched back to No. 2, a position they held in the preseason rankings. Three-time defending champs Texas A&M moved into the top five for the first time in the outdoor season at No. 4. On the women’s side, the top three teams stay the same with No. 1 Oregon, No. 2 LSU, and No. 3 Clemson holding serve. Florida jumped four spots up to No. 7, reaching the top ten for the first time so far this season. National Ranking PDFs: Top 25 | Full by Team | Event-by-Event | Week-by-Week
ABOUT THE RANKINGSFor more on the rankings and links to guideline and rationale information visit … The purpose and methodology of the national team computer rankings is to create an index that showcases the teams that have the best potential of achieving the top spots in the national-title race – not as a method to compare teams head-to-head. The Regional Index is determined using a similar method as national rankings, but on a smaller scale, comparing teams versus others within the same region. The result is a ranking that showcases squads with better all-around team potential — a group makeup critical for conference or similar team-scored events. A team may achieve a better regional ranking than a counterpart that has a better national ranking. Historically, some teams are better national-championship teams than conference-championship teams, having a few elite athletes that score very well in a diverse environment where teams do not have entries in more than a few events. Some teams are better at conference championships or similar team-scored events where they enter, and are competitive, in many of the events. How a team fares in a national championship, conference championship, or scored meet with only a couple or few teams (like a dual or triangular) can be very different, given the number of events, competition, scoring, and makeup of entries — thus the rationale behind each of the ranking systems. Similar arguments about team makeup and rankings can also be found in swimming & diving and wrestling as their sports also have a similar trichotomy when it comes to team theory. More news
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
