FoldersFeatured 0
Misc News 414
Results 483
Recaps 31
Previews 8
News 27
Webcast Info 45
Awards 7
Entries 119
Rankings 29
RRW 4
ACC 0
Big Ten 0
Big 12 0
Big Sky 0
Big West 0
C-USA 0
Colonial 0
Horizon 0
Ivy 0
gocrimson XC 30
MAAC 0
MAC 0
MEAC 0
themwc.com XC 177
NEC 0
Pac-12 0
Patriot 0
SEC 0
secsports.com XC 119
SoCon 0
Sun Belt 0
SWAC 0
WAC 0
|
New Week, Again New Number Ones: Florida, Texas Now Lead DI Rankings - USTFCCCAPublished by
New Week, Again New Number Ones: Florida, Texas Now Lead DI RankingsCourtesy: Tom Lewis, USTFCCCA May 1, 2012 NEW ORLEANS – For the second-straight week there are new number one men’s and women’s teams in the USTFCCCA NCAA Division I Outdoor Track & Field National Team Computer Rankings. Florida’s men reclaimed the No. 1 spot from Texas A&M, but by a very slim margin. Similarly, Texas’ women are now No. 1 by less than one ranking point ahead of last week’s top team — Clemson. National Ranking PDFs: Top 25 | Full by Team | Event-by-Event | Week-by-Week Three men’s teams have more than 200 ranking points — No. 1 Florida, No. 2 Texas A&M, and No. 3 Arizona State. The Sun Devils are at the No. 3 spot for the second-straight week. Southern California reached a season-high with a No. 4 ranking, up two spots from a week ago. Florida State stayed at No. 5 for the second time in a row. No. 8 Mississippi moved up three spots to reach a season best. On the women’s side, Texas took over No. 1 for the first time in the five years of ranking history. They and No. 2 Clemson are separated by less than a ranking point (286.74-286.22). In fact the top five teams are distanced by only 41 points as No. 3 Florida, No. 4 LSU, and No. 5 Kansas round out the top five.
ABOUT THE RANKINGSFor more on the rankings and links to guideline and rationale information visit … The purpose and methodology of the national team computer rankings is to create an index that showcases the teams that have the best potential of achieving the top spots in the national-title race – not as a method to compare teams head-to-head. The Regional Index is determined using a similar method as national rankings, but on a smaller scale, comparing teams versus others within the same region. The result is a ranking that showcases squads with better all-around team potential — a group makeup critical for conference or similar team-scored events. A team may achieve a better regional ranking than a counterpart that has a better national ranking. Historically, some teams are better national-championship teams than conference-championship teams, having a few elite athletes that score very well in a diverse environment where teams do not have entries in more than a few events. Some teams are better at conference championships or similar team-scored events where they enter, and are competitive, in many of the events. How a team fares in a national championship, conference championship, or scored meet with only a couple or few teams (like a dual or triangular) can be very different, given the number of events, competition, scoring, and makeup of entries — thus the rationale behind each of the ranking systems. Similar arguments about team makeup and rankings can also be found in swimming & diving and wrestling as their sports also have a similar trichotomy when it comes to team theory. More news
0 comment(s)
History for DyeStatCOLLEGE.com
Show 28 more
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Folders |
New Week, Again New Number Ones: Florida, Texas Now Lead DI Rankings - USTFCCCAPublished by
New Week, Again New Number Ones: Florida, Texas Now Lead DI RankingsCourtesy: Tom Lewis, USTFCCCA May 1, 2012 NEW ORLEANS – For the second-straight week there are new number one men’s and women’s teams in the USTFCCCA NCAA Division I Outdoor Track & Field National Team Computer Rankings. Florida’s men reclaimed the No. 1 spot from Texas A&M, but by a very slim margin. Similarly, Texas’ women are now No. 1 by less than one ranking point ahead of last week’s top team — Clemson. National Ranking PDFs: Top 25 | Full by Team | Event-by-Event | Week-by-Week Three men’s teams have more than 200 ranking points — No. 1 Florida, No. 2 Texas A&M, and No. 3 Arizona State. The Sun Devils are at the No. 3 spot for the second-straight week. Southern California reached a season-high with a No. 4 ranking, up two spots from a week ago. Florida State stayed at No. 5 for the second time in a row. No. 8 Mississippi moved up three spots to reach a season best. On the women’s side, Texas took over No. 1 for the first time in the five years of ranking history. They and No. 2 Clemson are separated by less than a ranking point (286.74-286.22). In fact the top five teams are distanced by only 41 points as No. 3 Florida, No. 4 LSU, and No. 5 Kansas round out the top five.
ABOUT THE RANKINGSFor more on the rankings and links to guideline and rationale information visit … The purpose and methodology of the national team computer rankings is to create an index that showcases the teams that have the best potential of achieving the top spots in the national-title race – not as a method to compare teams head-to-head. The Regional Index is determined using a similar method as national rankings, but on a smaller scale, comparing teams versus others within the same region. The result is a ranking that showcases squads with better all-around team potential — a group makeup critical for conference or similar team-scored events. A team may achieve a better regional ranking than a counterpart that has a better national ranking. Historically, some teams are better national-championship teams than conference-championship teams, having a few elite athletes that score very well in a diverse environment where teams do not have entries in more than a few events. Some teams are better at conference championships or similar team-scored events where they enter, and are competitive, in many of the events. How a team fares in a national championship, conference championship, or scored meet with only a couple or few teams (like a dual or triangular) can be very different, given the number of events, competition, scoring, and makeup of entries — thus the rationale behind each of the ranking systems. Similar arguments about team makeup and rankings can also be found in swimming & diving and wrestling as their sports also have a similar trichotomy when it comes to team theory. More news
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
