FoldersFeatured 579
Misc News 137
Results 1687
Recaps 65
Previews 25
Webcast Info 124
Awards 31
Entries 15
Rankings 69
RRW 7
USTFCCCA.org D1 340
ACC 0
goduke.com T&F 129
Big Ten 0
huskers.com T&F 103
Big 12 0
Big Sky 0
Big West 0
C-USA 0
Colonial 0
Horizon 0
Ivy 0
MAAC 0
MAC 0
gozips.com T&F 173
MEAC 0
NEC 0
Pac-12 0
Patriot 0
SEC 0
SoCon 0
Sun Belt 0
SWAC 0
WAC 0
USTFCCCA.org D2 181
All 51921
|
Track and field rule delayed for one year - NCAA.comPublished by
Committee seeks more feedback on verifiable entry performances
The NCAA Men’s and Women’s Track and Field Rules Committee decided to delay for one year the implementation of a rules change that requires verifiable entry performances to be published through an online NCAA reporting system. As a result, the rule will now go into effect Dec. 1, 2017. The committee, which met Tuesday via conference call, has received feedback from the membership about unintended consequences of implementing the rule during the 2016-17 indoor and outdoor track and field seasons. Some of the concerns include the unintended effects on incoming freshman athletes, injured athletes and distance runners who would have to be entered with a “no mark” performance until a verifiable current season performance is established. This could lead to inequitable competition due to student-athletes not being seeded properly. Read the full article at: www.ncaa.com
Hashtags#ncaa
0 comment(s)
History for DyeStatCOLLEGE.com
Show 28 more
Hashtags#ncaa
|
Folders |
Track and field rule delayed for one year - NCAA.comPublished by
Committee seeks more feedback on verifiable entry performances
The NCAA Men’s and Women’s Track and Field Rules Committee decided to delay for one year the implementation of a rules change that requires verifiable entry performances to be published through an online NCAA reporting system. As a result, the rule will now go into effect Dec. 1, 2017. The committee, which met Tuesday via conference call, has received feedback from the membership about unintended consequences of implementing the rule during the 2016-17 indoor and outdoor track and field seasons. Some of the concerns include the unintended effects on incoming freshman athletes, injured athletes and distance runners who would have to be entered with a “no mark” performance until a verifiable current season performance is established. This could lead to inequitable competition due to student-athletes not being seeded properly. Read the full article at: www.ncaa.com
|
